Selectmen Wrestle with License Plate Reader
Grant for Police equipment stirs a debate about privacy and stalking.
Chief of Police Daniel O'Leary asked the Board of Selectmen to approve a grant the Police Department has been offered to install an Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) system in one of their cruisers, saying it "Allows an officer to work more efficiently."
The ALPR uses a low-mounted infra-red camera and optical character recognition technology to photograph and read the number plates on vehicles it passes. The license number is fed into a computer, which compares it to a "hot list," updated daily, and alerts the operator when it "sees" a car on that list. The device records all of the vehicles it identifies for later analysis.
O'Leary explained, "If there are a hundred cars on the street, it would record those hundred cars."
The hot list could contain numbers related to something like Amber alerts, stolen or wanted vehicles, or those listed for towing due to unpaid parking tickets. The system could also be used to keep an eye out for criminal activity, for example a vehicle seen in an area where a number of break-ins was reported could be connected and identified.
The system is not automated, and an officer driving the cruiser equipped with this technology will still need confirmation before he or she could pull over an identified car. This is in part to confirm, and also because the system may not be able to identify out-of-state plates.
The confirmation is also one of part of a packet of guidelines that O'Leary and Town Counsel Patricia Correa have drafted for this system's use. In order to protect privacy, a transparent and firm set of rules have to be established before the Police can use an ALPR system.
What troubled the Board--and the ACLU at an Arizona conference O'Leary referenced--was the way the device stores that list. The device stores a list of any car that it sees for 30 days. In the name of transparency, as with the CIMS Cameras, the information it pulls is also a matter of Public Record.
The Board's main concern is whether or not it could be used by someone stalking another person.
“The only thing in this particular system records is the license plate.” O'Leary noted, “If you don’t know the license plate of the target, it wouldn’t get you anything... It can’t tie a plate to any user.”
O'Leary did acknowledge that, if a person--even a stalker--could provide enough reason for a public record request, they could get the GPS location, date and time when a certain vehicle was located.
DeWitt summarized the Board's comments, "if this could be useful to a predator, we don’t want it."
Benka added, "It doesn’t warrant a line in the sand, but it does warrant further discussion."
To that end, the conversation will be picked up at next week's meeting, where public comments will be heard about the proposed guidelines for use and the use of an ALPR system. If approved, the system would not begin use until mid-July, O'Leary estimated.
MoonBeamWatcher
4:46 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Beats the heck out of the sillyness the ticket purchasing scheme is!
What a choir to do with a light snow on the windscreen!
Ahhhhm. . . this is employed in Canada and I think Boston.
Can read plate, check if stolen, inspection sticker valid or if
used in a crime . . . and would have been a wonderful addition
to augment the installed meeters! Could flip Left or Right and
scann and ID plate for over 2 hour in same location as well.
With push of button, print out a ticket and move on.
Should hang a NUMBER on all the walkers so our SAFETY
OFFICERS could issue J-Walking tickets!
MoonBeamWatcher
5:00 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
The ACLU raised it's high pitched shrilly voice on this subject!
ahhhhhh, where was the ACLU when "THEY" froze Social Security COLA?
How about ACLU dealing with The League of Woman Voters attack on
Senator Scott Brown? THE League has taken sides and lost it's credability!
Why isn't the ACLU having a hissy-fit over this?
Seems like all food packages shrunk . . . ahhhh, but price is the same, doesn't
that indicate "Less Food for more MONEY?" Then we have home heating oil.
Everyone cried about $4 for gas for car when EVERYONE including seniors on
SS paid over that for Home Heating Oil all winter! ACLU where are YOU?