Community Corner

Letter to the Editor: Density and Greenness

Brookline resident writes about the Brookline Climate Action plan and his concerns about density and being green.

The Town of Brookline has a climate action plan meant to combat climate change at a local level. I don't know how many cities and towns do this, but I'm guessing Brookline is on the more progressive side. The wiki lists major areas of action such as energy efficiency, renewable energy, urban form and mobility, consumption and solid waste, food and agriculture, and community coordination, along with actions for future consideration. Each area has between one and a dozen more specific actions. 

A common tactic for enforcing these actions is through the town's existing zoning laws, either as requirements or incentives. Unfortunately nothing is mentioned about one of the most powerful aspects of zoning - controlling density. In this case, nothing is said about increasing density in the town (it's possible you could say this one unfinished article advocates for increased density). Density is what makes cities more energy efficient than suburban and rural areas. And while Brookline calls itself a town and organizes its government as a town, it certainly exhibits many of the geographical and demographic qualities of a city. I live in Coolidge Corner, which is clearly an urban environment. All of Beacon Street from St. Mary's Street to Cleveland Circle is urban. Brookline Village is. So is everything that borders Boston on the north side and everything that borders the Longwood Medical area. There's more, but that's really the extent of my everyday life, so that's all I'll cite. 

When people talk about green roofs and bike routes and public transit, they're talking about things that are only feasible in dense areas. Brookline is served by three lines of above ground subway - the C and D lines are in Brookline, but the B line is close enough to serve residents as well - and a number of bus lines. This doesn't happen without density. The greater distances between homes and work and commerce are, the less people use bikes as part of their everyday lives. 

If Brookline is estimating 25% of its emissions come from transportation then making mass transit and bicycle travel easier is a good place to start. Another 26% is estimated to come from electricity while 44% comes from heating in the cold New England winter. I submit that the those two numbers could be reduced with more density. One large building could better regulate heat usage and improve energy efficiency than many dispersed dwellings. 

More density is not without its drawbacks. More people in closer space will increase pressure on roads and parks. There will need to be an increase in services if the population rises, though those services would probably be more efficiently delivered. And more housing stock will depress housing values. These are debates we in Brookline should have. But just because there are drawbacks - and even if those drawbacks preclude the town from adopting zoning laws that allow for higher density - does not mean they should be excluded from the conversation.

Sincerely, 
Jeff Egnaczyk

This post originally appeared on Egnaczyk's The Boonville Blog, and was sent in as a Letter to the Editor.  

Find out what's happening in Brooklinewith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Do you have an issue in or out of town that you want to write about? Send Patch Editor Grahame Turner your , or consider . Send your letters or questions to Grahame.Turner@Patch.com


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here